FACT: Among the inspired ideas of polymath Danny Hillis (pioneer of parallel computing) was establishing the Long Now Foundation, whose projects include the millennial Long-Now Clock (“the world’s slowest computer”) and the notion of “Long Bets.” A Long Bet is an “accountable prediction,” meaning one that has a specified end-date and a testable, wagerable, proposition. One of the early Long Bets posted wagers $2,000 that “By 2020, no one will have won a Nobel Prize for work on superstring theory, membrane theory, or some other unified theory describing all the forces of nature.” That particular bet is one of many signs of scientific skepticism about string theory.
ANALYSIS: Even without the ease of hyperlinks, old-fashioned newspapers foster serendipitous connections between articles, particularly if you’re reading a Sunday morning paper with lots of sections. Sunday the Washington Post did me a service by placing in different sections a couple of articles which I connected, about intelligence “failures” and about stock-market prediction, leading me to some web-surfing about the questionable validity of string theory and some related observations about the difficulty of predicting human behavior.
In the Outlook section, the Post has an opinionated and thought-provoking op-ed piece by Mark Lowenthal, one of the most “intelligent” individuals in the recent history of the U.S. intelligence community (after all, he was the 1988 Jeopardy grand champion, as well as a former assistant director of CIA).
Filed under: Technology | Tagged: 9/11, analysis, CIA, Columbia, Columbia University, computer science, cryptography, Daniel Kahneman, Danny Hillis, failure, foreign affairs, future, Government, human, hyperlinks, IC, Intelligence, intelligence analysis, Intelligence Community, intelligence reform, international relations, iraq, Jennifer Chayes, leather, Long Now, Mark Lowenthal, market forecasting, math, mathematics, media, membrane theory, Microsoft, Microsoft Research, newspaper, newspapers, Nobel, Nobel Prize, parallel computing, Pearl Harbor, Peter Woit, physics, prediction, predictive analysis, Princeton, Ramones, science, Serendipity, social, social networks, social science, social sciences, Society, stock market, string theory, superstring, superstring theory, terrorism, terrorists, The Times, Times of London, war, Washington Post | 6 Comments »